Rk | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | K Arduino | American Int'l | 9 | 119 | 213 | 55.9% | 1978 | 219.8 | 9.3 | 12 | 8 | 85 | 145.0 |
1 | B Beeker | Pace | 9 | 24 | 60 | 40.0% | 242 | 26.9 | 4.0 | 2 | 4 | 39 | 71.5 |
1 | J Bernard | Saint Anselm | 9 | 0 | 1 | .0% | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
1 | J Botti | LIU Post | 9 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | -37.4 |
1 | J Clancy | Merrimack | 9 | 328 | 513 | 63.9% | 3547 | 394.1 | 6.9 | 40 | 9 | 68 | 144.2 |
1 | M DeCaro | New Haven | 9 | 0 | 1 | .0% | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
1 | S Grayson | Saint Anselm | 9 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 30 | 3.3 | 30.0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 352.0 |
1 | A Greenfield | New Haven | 9 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 19 | 2.1 | 19.0 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 589.6 |
1 | D Guadagnoli | Bentley | 9 | 191 | 324 | 59.0% | 2638 | 293.1 | 8.1 | 16 | 8 | 76 | 138.7 |
1 | T Heuer | LIU Post | 9 | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | 15 | 1.7 | 7.5 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 493.0 |
1 | B Jordan | Assumption | 9 | 133 | 243 | 54.7% | 1698 | 188.7 | 7.0 | 11 | 7 | 56 | 122.6 |
1 | S Laurino | LIU Post | 9 | 200 | 337 | 59.3% | 2351 | 261.2 | 7.0 | 20 | 16 | 58 | 128.0 |
1 | M Montalto | Bentley | 9 | 6 | 14 | 42.9% | 101 | 11.2 | 7.2 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 112.7 |
1 | R Nelson | New Haven | 9 | 137 | 221 | 62.0% | 2380 | 264.4 | 10.8 | 26 | 6 | 75 | 185.8 |
1 | N Robitaille | Stonehill | 9 | 0 | 1 | .0% | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
1 | P Tyler | Assumption | 9 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 26 | 2.9 | 26.0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 318.4 |
17 | W Clements | New Haven | 8 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 0.6 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 71.0 |
17 | N Harrington | Assumption | 8 | 0 | 1 | .0% | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
17 | L Meyer | Stonehill | 8 | 146 | 280 | 52.1% | 1999 | 249.9 | 7.1 | 23 | 6 | 67 | 134.9 |
17 | A Washington | Pace | 8 | 167 | 292 | 57.2% | 1906 | 238.3 | 6.5 | 10 | 21 | 41 | 108.9 |
21 | J Della Vecchia | Stonehill | 7 | 21 | 32 | 65.6% | 267 | 38.1 | 8.3 | 2 | 2 | 38 | 143.8 |
21 | A Murphy | Saint Anselm | 7 | 166 | 264 | 62.9% | 1512 | 216.0 | 5.7 | 10 | 10 | 59 | 115.9 |
23 | K Bynum | So. Connecticut | 6 | 1 | 3 | 33.3% | 22 | 3.7 | 7.3 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 94.9 |
23 | M Eckrote | So. Connecticut | 6 | 3 | 9 | 33.3% | 38 | 6.3 | 4.2 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 68.8 |
23 | Y Gavalas | Saint Anselm | 6 | 90 | 123 | 73.2% | 1155 | 192.5 | 9.4 | 11 | 4 | 83 | 175.1 |
23 | D White | New Haven | 6 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 41 | 6.8 | 41.0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 444.4 |
27 | B Basil | So. Connecticut | 5 | 50 | 111 | 45.0% | 478 | 95.6 | 4.3 | 2 | 7 | 29 | 74.6 |
27 | J Jablonski | So. Connecticut | 5 | 79 | 131 | 60.3% | 1108 | 221.6 | 8.5 | 7 | 7 | 77 | 138.3 |
29 | L Bakanowsky | Merrimack | 4 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 9 | 2.3 | 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 87.8 |
29 | M Brennan | LIU Post | 4 | 28 | 51 | 54.9% | 264 | 66.0 | 5.2 | 2 | 0 | 35 | 111.3 |